Bad businesses die. Period. If there’s ever an axiom that has held true throughout the ages, it’s that one. No matter how unique, how revolutionary, how needed, you simply cannot be a bad business and expect people to continue to pay you. Bad service, bad products, bad delivery, bad fulfillment, all of it—every last element—will kill you. The competition will either catch up, or buy you out.
Especially now that the Internet has changed the rules of customer service. Businesses used to be able to get away with the occasional, or even frequent bad habit, because, well, people didn’t have as many choices. Now they do. If they don’t like you, they can go across town, or even across states without ever leaving their living room sofa. If you suck (for lack of a more descriptive word), and suck consistently, people find out, and usually sooner than later.
On the other end of the spectrum, there are always a few great companies that set themselves apart from their competition. In every sector and industry, whether it be a handful or just a single company, there are always organizations that consistently outperform their counterparts in their given fields.
This is especially evident in the over-used yet still eminently applicable corollary of professional sports. There are always a half-dozen or so franchises that seem to be in the upper half of the standings year-in and year-out. The Yankees. The Cowboys. The Celtics. Sports brand names that through time have come to be linked with success. Sure, they go through rough patches now and then, but overall their performance tends to remain consistent. Seasons come and go, but they’re almost always in the playoff hunt, they seem to hire good coaches, and they’re consistently putting themselves in positions to succeed.
But between the range of “truly bad” and “truly great” companies runs an entire gamut of mediocre. From “just good enough to not slide off the face of the earth,” to “almost great but not quite getting over the hump,” there are hundreds of thousands of small- to mid-sized businesses trying to make the leap. The hardest part of being stuck here? No matter where you fall in the spectrum of mediocrity, the effect is essentially the same—you’re holding yourselves back from success. For whatever reason, from that painful, expensive-to-fix flaw in your production system, to your poor management of customer service, to that lone supplier that keeps missing shipping deadlines, you’re being railroaded from your destination.
Now, here’s the catch—you can be profitable by being mediocre. Really. You don’t have to please the world; in fact, like a lot of things, you really only have to do “just enough” to survive. And quite frankly, a lot of managers and CEOs are okay with that. As long as they’re getting paid, as long as things are “okay,” they’re fine with mediocrity, and if you’re one of those types of people/companies/management teams, well, then, don’t ever change. Or at least, only change enough to not become a bad company, because as we said before, bad companies die. Mediocre ones can stay in business, bad ones can’t, so you at least have to be progressive enough to not slip into the “bad” category.
But is that what your customers really want? If the shoe was on the other foot, would you really want to hang your hat on an organization whose motto was “We’re #57!” or “Aiming for mediocrity, one day at a time”? What is it, then, that sets apart the truly great from the merely good or mediocre?
Regardless of organization, it typically comes down to three things:
-
Talent
-
Leadership
-
Innovation
That’s it. There’s no “special sauce,” no magic formula. It doesn’t take market projections or demographics. It simply takes dedication to the ideal of meeting the needs of your customers, and then allocating the resources to do it.
All three are required. You can’t have just one, or even two of the three. Without even one of the three, the other two are meaningless. Talent and leadership without innovation means your core product is good, but you’re left in the dark the second the market changes. Talent and innovation without leadership means you’ve got the best products and services, but can’t ever execute on delivering more than a handful of them—organizational needs are unmet. Leadership and innovation without talent means your products and services are inferior to the competition, regardless of how well organized and compelling your business model is. Without the right talent, the competition is always going to be doing it better, cheaper, or both, because they have the right people producing for them.
Again, the sports world analogy applies. In NFL football, teams stockpile talent any way they can—draft, free agency, trade. Owners hire the best coaches they can for organization and motivation. Game day preparation requires constant innovation. Running a five-year-old, or even one-year-old offense and defense is a formula for defeat. Other teams are far too driven to remain static. That doesn’t mean teams abandon their core principles. It simply means that they find new wrinkles from year-to-year, even game-to-game.
In the end, the choice is not between existence or non-existence. Continued existence or bankruptcy are simply a collective result of all of the other decisions. The real choice is between underwhelming mediocrity or greatness. And it is a choice. Choosing not to choose is still a choice, it’s simply a choice for the status quo. Passive acceptance of existing modes of thinking, existing modes of operation, is a choice to accept the results you are already getting. The conscious choice to change is the only way to ultimately increase success.